If you’ve been following my posts on astronomy, you surely are aware that I am a learner-in-progress when it comes to astrophotography. Yet, like so many producers of this or that, there comes a time when highlights of their work are published. So it is in my case. I am devoting this post to the twelve “best” astrophotographs I have taken this past year. (BY ALL MEANS CLICK ON EACH OF THE PICTURES FOR A DETAILED LOOK.)
At No. 1 is my recent photo of M51, the Whirlpool galaxy below. I am one of those astrophotographers who does not like to spend the hours it takes to get a picture worthy of publication. In other words, when I go out to my observatory I want to spend two hours maximum and come home with a picture or pictures that are worth saving. So, what to do?
Two solutions: First, invest in the biggest scope within my budget with lots of light-gathering capability. Second, invest in the best CCD camera I can afford. Both I have done. I have a 14” LX200 Meade ACF Go-To telescope and an SBIG ST-4000XCM CCD camera with built-in autoguider.

There are basically four approaches to use with a CCD camera. No. 1: Guiding with an autoguider using a radial off-axis guider; No. 2: Guiding with an autoguider using a separate guide scope; No. 3: Track and Accumulate, an SBIG patented technique where multiple images are added together with shifts to produce a longer equivalent exposure; and No. 4: Self-guiding.
Method No. 1: I have used an off-axis guider, but it involves handling equipment on the scope…a bump here or there can mess up a picture.
Method No. 2: I have an 80 mm guidescope and used it with a separate autoguider. No sustained interest in that approach. I don’t like the time it takes to calibrate a guide star before you start imaging the target. Also, my big 14” scope did not like to respond to the autoguider’s calibration, even though I sought advice from the best amateur astrophotographer in the business, Chris Hendron.
Method No. 3: My current method of choice is the Track & Accumulate technique. One finds out the maximum time of exposure that avoids star-trailing or even oblong stars, then takes multiple exposures (10, 20, or more) for that period of time …say 60 seconds. For the M51Whirlpool galaxy, I took 20 images at 45 sec. each giving me a 900 second exposure, or 15 minutes. If I had taken more exposures, the detail would be enhanced, but I liked the results, and was satisfied.
Method No. 4: In the future, I will go to the final technique of finding a good guide star and letting the camera self-guide itself. That will be the key to improved images.
Getting back to my best images…most of which were taken using the T&A method…
At No. 2, the Eagle Nebula, M16, also famous as the “Pillars of Creation”:
At No. 3, the Trifid Nebula, M20:

At No. 4, M42, the Orion Nebula:

At No. 5, the Omega or Swan nebula, M17:

At No. 6, M5 a dense star cluster:

At No. 7, M88 a spiral galaxy:

At No. 8, Jupiter with Red Spot:

At No. 9, the Irregular galaxy, M82:

At No. 10...Lunar craters Copernicus and Erotasthenes...and the Apenine mountains.

At No. 11, M31, the Andromeda Galaxy:

Finally, M101, the Pinwheel Galaxy:

So, there you have it…my best efforts at astrophotography over the past year. I still have much to learn and an absolute must is learning how to use the autoguider in my camera to self-guide.
Then, I can go home and watch some TV for a couple of hours while my scope, camera, and computer do their thing. But wait, I’m a “hands-on” kind of guy who likes to see things happen …so maybe I’ll never get to the point of perfection. But, hey, that’s okay…it’s all in the learning and doing when your gallery of objects is the universe.